DWP
  • Introduction
  • Wine & Roses Bar
  • About
  • Contact
  • DISCLAIMER:
  • BACKGROUND STORY
  • ILLEGAL AGREEMENT
  • INVOICE FRAUD
  • S.L.A. FRAUDS
  • AVAILING
  • CORRUPTION
  • EXTORTION / BLACKMAIL
  • CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  • BANK FRAUD
  • INSURANCE FRAUD
  • TAX FRAUD
  • • SUMMARY
  • ASSAULT / HARRASSMENT
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

DWP

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Introduction
  • Wine & Roses Bar
  • About
  • Contact
  • DISCLAIMER:
  • BACKGROUND STORY
  • ILLEGAL AGREEMENT
  • INVOICE FRAUD
  • S.L.A. FRAUDS
  • AVAILING
  • CORRUPTION
  • EXTORTION / BLACKMAIL
  • CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  • BANK FRAUD
  • INSURANCE FRAUD
  • TAX FRAUD
  • • SUMMARY
  • ASSAULT / HARRASSMENT

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

SUMMARY

- SAYS SLA AGENT - MARTIN P. MEHLER

ACCORDING TO NYS LIQUOR AUTHORITY AGENTS ABOVE, THE CRIME OF AVAILING IS "AKIN TO MURDER" AND PUNISHABLE BY SIGNIFICANT FINES AND IMPRISONMENT.  IT WAS THE VERY REASON THE SLA WAS FORMED:


"TO REGULATE THE LIQUOR INDUSTRY STILL RIFE WITH MOBSTERS."


MR. PADUANO DID NOT WANT TO MAKE ANY LEGAL RECORD OF 286 LLC'S EXISTENCE BECAUSE ON 'MAY 30, 2014,' THREE WEEKS AFTER STEALING CONTROL OF MY BAR, HE WANTED TO CLOSE IT.


MR. PADUANO HAD SAID TO ME WALKING OUT OF THE COURTHOUSE ON MAY 5, 2014: 


**************************************************************************

"I COULD GET IN A LOT OF TROUBLE FOR WHAT I JUST DID."  

**************************************************************************


AS IF HE WAS DOING ME A FAVOR STEALING MY BAR FOR HIMSELF AND MAKING ME PAY FOR IT?


MR. PAUANO LIED TO THE WORLD THAT - 'I' - PREVENTED HIM AND HIS LAW FIRM FROM GETTING A LIQUOR LICENSE.  HOW COULD I POSSIBLY DO THAT?  WHY WOULD I WANT TO?   


  • WHERE ARE ALL HIS EMAILS FOR 18 MONTHS DEMANDING I SIGN THE DOCUMENT HE CENTERS HIS WHOLE INCREDULOUS 'BLAME THE VICTIM' GAME UPON?


  • IS MR. PADUANO ABSURDLY AND PATHETICALLY CLAIMING HE IS MY VICTIM?


  • IS HE AND HIS ENTIRE LAW FIRM SO WEAK THAT I COULD OVERPOWER IT?

 

  • IS HE SO IGNORANT OF THE LAW, HE DID NOT KNOW THIS LEGAL REQUIREMENT WAS OF EXISTENTIAL  IMPORTANCE?


  • IS HE SO ENTITLED HE DOES NOT CARE IF HE DOES VIOLATE LAWS?


HE DID NOT WANT TO BE ON THE LICENSE AND MALICIOUSLY TRIED TO FRAME ME FOR HIS CONTINUING VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW.   HE DID THIS SO HE WOULD HAVE AN EXCUSE TO TELL RUTH AND MR. WEINTRAUB WHEN HE CLOSED THE BAR AND STARTED HIS OWN IN ITS PLACE: 


HE PATHETICALLY PUT FORTH THE INCREDIBLE NOTION THAT "HE" WAS THE VICTIM!  MY VICTIM. 


HIS RIDICULOUS 'BIG LIE' IS 'OUTED' WITHIN 2 SECONDS OF READING HIS SELF-INCRIMINATING EMAILS DISPLAYED ON THIS WEBSITE WHICH HE ARROGANTLY THOUGHT WOULD NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY. 


MOST IMPORTANTLY, IF YOU ARE TO TAKE MR. PADUANO'S BIG LIE SERIOUSLY, THEN HIS 'PURPOSEFUL NEGLECT' TO SEND ME HOURLY OBLIGATORY EMAILS TO REMIND ME OF THIS ESSENTIAL MATTER TO THE BAR'S VERY EXISTENCE - ARE IN TOTAL CONTRADICTION TO HIS CLAIM THAT I STOPPED HIM AND HIS LAW FIRM IN ITS TRACKS.


***WHEN HE CAVALIERLY FLAUNTED HIS REPREHENSIBLE GROSS NEGLIGENCE IN HIS NOVEMBER 12, 2014 EMAIL - WHAT STOPPED HIM FROM TRYING TO GET A LICENSE FOR OVER A YEAR AFTERWARDS?


TODD AND I HAVE A HUNDRED EMAILS DURING THAT TIME (AND ALL OTHERS) SHOWING OUR GOOD FAITH AND UTTER RESPECT.  WE ALSO HAVE A HUNDRED FROM MR. PADUANO THAT DO NOT MENTION THIS APPLICATION IN QUESTION.  (THERE WAS ONE CONFUSING EXCHANGE WHERE HE MISDIRECTED THE DOCUMENT TO THE CB7 AND WE CORRECTED HIM, AND THEN CB7 CORRECTED HIM WITH THE SAME DIRECTIONS.  THEN HE NEVER MENTIONED IT AGAIN.


I WAS NEVER EVEN COPIED ON THOSE EMAILS TO CB7 EITHER, AS CAN BE SEEN FROM THE DATES OF THE EXCHANGES. 


****************************

INSTEAD OF THEN SENDING THE APPLICATION TO THE SLA AS INSTRUCTED BY CB7, HE SILENTLY DROPPED THE BALL ENTIRELY AND FIRST INFORMED US ON NOVEMBER 12, 2014 AS AN EXCUSE FOR 'MY' CAUSING HIS AVAILING.

*****************************


I AM SURE HE UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS MIS-DIRECTED DOCUMENT OCCURRED 'AFTER' HIS INITIATING ILLEGAL 286 AGREEMENT, INVOICES, VIOLATIONS, AND MULTIPLE FRAUDS FOR THE PREVIOUS THREE MONTHS.  


I DO NOT HATE MR. PADUANO.  WE FEEL SORRY FOR HIM.  TODD AND I NEVER REFUSED A SINGLE THING HE ASKED US TO DO.  WE ALWAYS FOLLOWED ALL OF MR. PADUANO DEMANDS, CRAZY OR CRAZIER, UNTIL IT WAS INEXCUSABLY, IMPOSSIBLY ILLEGAL AND I WOULD HAVE TO BREAK THE LAW AND PUT MYSELF IN MORE LEGAL JEOPARDY THAN HE ALREADY PUT ME IN.


HIS FRAMING ME FOR HIS OWN CRIMES MADE ME VERY SICK, LITERALLY.  I ALMOST KILLED MYSELF, I WAS SUFFERING SO MUCH.  I HAD A 'PSYCHOTIC' NERVOUS BREAKDOWN AND NOW HAVE TO TAKE A DRUG FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE TO TO KEEP IT AT BAY. TODD AND I BOTH SEE PSYCHIATRISTS, MONTHLY AS A RESULT OF MR. PADUANO'S ATROCIOUS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL STRESS.

MY 'ONLY' GOAL WAKING UP EVERY MORNING WAS: HOW COULD I SAVE MY GOOD REPUTATION FROM MR. PADUANO'S INEVITABLE CAREER ENDING, LIFE ALTERING, PUBLIC HUMILIATION?  I KNEW I COULDN'T.  HE WAS ALREADY DOING IT.


MR. PADUANO WANTED TO GET AWAY FROM HIS FRAUDS, AS MUCH AS WE WANTED TO GET AWAY FROM HIM.  AND HE NEEDED A SCAPEGOAT.


MR. PADUANO LAMELY WHIMPERS THAT I REFUSED TO SIGN HIS APPLICATION TO THE SLA. I NEVER REFUSED AND I HAVE OVER A HUNDRED EMAILS DURING THIS TIME PERIOD CORROBORATING HE MADE NO EFFORT TO APPLY TO THE SLA.  


I WAS THE ONLY PERSON IN DANGER OF LOSING THEIR LICENSE BECAUSE OF MR. PADUANO'S REFUSAL TO TAKE ACTION.  HE, P&W, AND 286 LLC DID NOT EXIST TO THE SLA. I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT REPORTING HIS GROSS NEGLIGENCE - NOT APPLYING FOR A LICENSE WITHIN TEN DAYS OF MAY 5, 2014.


I BEGGED HIM TO APPLY TO THE SLA SO THE BAR WOULD NOT BE CLOSED. 

I EVEN SENT HIM INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO DO IT.  BUT HE ALREADY KNEW HOW, BECAUSE HE SPENT THREE MONTHS SUCCESSFULLY APPLYING TO THE SLA FOR MY 100% OWNERSHIP/ LICENSE COMMITTING SERIOUS FRAUDS IN THE PROCESS.

SLA LICENSE WITH LAW WRITTEN ON IT.

Mr. Paduano, and Mr. Weintraub signed the illegal shell 286 LLC Agreement for P&W LLP law firm, incriminating their entire law firm with their unethical actions. The partners of the firm refuse to respond my many requests for a meeting about the frauds committed on its letterhead and in it's name. 


I RECEIVED NOTHING FROM THE SETTLEMENT EXCEPT INDENTURED SERVITUDE. IN ADDITION TO $400,000.00 AND 51% OWNERSHIP, MR. PAUANO AND HIS PARTNER ALSO CO-OPTED:


  • MY HALF MILLION DOLLAR LOCATION BUILD-OUT THAT I SPENT FOUR YEARS OF BLOOD, SWEAT, AND TEARS TO PAY BACK MY INVESTORS.


  • MY REGISTERED TRADEMARK FOR MY FAMOUS NAME, "WINE & ROSES."


  • MY $30,000.00 LEASE DEPOSIT, HELD FOR TEN YEARS BY MY LANDLORD. 


  • AND ME.  HIS 286 LLC AGREEMENT 'LITERALLY' MADE ME HIS INDENTURED SERVANT. 


AFTER THE MAY 5, 2014 SETTLEMENT, MR. PADUANO SURPRISED ME BY MAILING, EMAILING, AND BY OTHER MEANS, SEVERAL COPIES OF HIS "MANUFACTURED" SUMMARY INVOICE THAT MANIPULATED THE PAST 4 YEARS INTO EXACTLY $400,000.00.


HE MAILED ME 'REMINDERS' TO PAY HIS LAW FIRM. LATER, HE THREATENED TO SUE ME FOR THE $400,000.00 IF I DID NOT PERFORM ILLEGAL ACTS TO COVER UP HIS PLETHORA OF FRAUDS. 

 
HE THREATENED ME WITH BLACKMAIL AND EXTORTION IN WRITING IF I DID NOT ASSIGN "100 PERCENT" OF MY BAR TO HIM.  I NEVER HAD THE CONTROLLING INTEREST OF THE BAR I CREATED FOR A SPLIT SECOND.


HIS SECRET '286 LLC AGREEMENT' WAS ILLEGAL ON ITS FACE.  
THAT LEFT ME WHERE?  VERY CONFUSED.  REMEMBER, EVERYTHING THAT I WRITE ABOUT NOW,  I WAS EXPERIENCING IN REAL TIME BACK THEN WITHOUT A CLUE.   I STILL THOUGHT RUTH WAS GOING TO BE MY PARTNER IN SOME FORM.


**********************************


JUST THREE WEEKS AFTER THE SETTLEMENT, ON MAY 30, 2014, MR. PADUANO WROTE THAT HE WAS GOING TO THROW ME A "CURVE BALL."


HE WAS GOING TO SELL THE BAR OR CLOSE IT DOWN BECAUSE HE "COULD NOT STOMACH THE LIABILITIES ANYMORE."


**********************************

 
WITHIN THREE WEEKS, MR.PADUANO STRETCHED HIS SECRET OWNERSHIP INTO FULL BLOWN LIES TO THE NYSDT&F, NY STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, IRS, ADP, ALONG WITH BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, VENDORS, MY LANDLORD AND EVERY SINGLE ENTITY WITH WHICH I DID BUSINESS.

THERE ARE NO GREY ARGUMENTS HERE.  NO "HE SAID" - "SHE SAID."  THERE IS ONLY THE BLACK AND WHITE EVIDENCE WRITTEN BY MR. PADUANO, HIMSELF. 


MR. PADUANO'S INITIATING CRIME ON MAY 5, 2014 WAS HAVING ME SIGN HIS ILLEGAL 286 LLC AGREEMENT, IN EFFECT AVAILING MY BAR AND SPAWNING AN EVER GROWING LIST OF FRAUDS TO COVER IT UP. 


Mr. Paduano never provided a retainer agreement.  


He 'never' sent me a monthly bill (or any other) for four years because he was representing me - pro bono. He made sure everyone knew, including the Editor-in-Chief of the New York Post.

 

Mr. Paduano later wrote me that he only represented me to ingratiate himself to Ruth, by "playing the hero."


Ruth is "the is the most powerful woman in the tech world," according to Forbes magazine. According to Business Insider magazine, Mr. Paduano is the second "luckiest man for marrying her."


On May 5, 2014, after four gaseous years of Mr. Paduano's unnecessary delays with the defendants' lawyers, Mr. Paduano finally settled his feckless slander lawsuit, writing me afterwards it was "impossible to win" from the beginning.


Against my will, Mr. Paduano took 51% of my stock (and 100% control) of my famous bar for himself, his law firm partner, Mr. Leonard Weintraub, and his law firm, using their new "secret" shell company, 286 Columbus Partners LLC (286 LLC) 100% wholly owned by P&W LLP.


He had the audacity to repeatedly chant, "you won, Jennifer, you won..."  "I will be your best partner ever" - over and over.  It was incomprehensible.  He just spent four years to TAKE CONTROL HIMSELF.


For the next 18 months, Mr. Paduano, as my "alleged" lawyer and fiduciary partner, refused to transfer the stock, nor put himself, 286 LLC, or his law firm, Paduano & Weintraub LLP, on a single document, anywhere. 


This is the crime of 'AVAILING": the transference of stock or taking control of a bar without first being fingerprinted and providing full financial disclosure to get "prior approval" from the NY State Liquor Authority for the transfer of stock and New York State liquor license.


The application to the SLA must be done within 10 days of any agreements between shareholders. If it is not done within ten days, the current license holder (me) is required to immediately report his failure to the New York State Liquor Authority ("SLA"). By not doing so I could have lost my license.  Mr. Paduano made me stay in this impossible situation for over a year and a half.


"Availing" is the most egregious state liquor law you can violate, punishable by instant closure upon discovery, followed by hefty fines and even imprisonment.


Mr. Paduano's initiating crime of 'availment' requires serious criminal violations of state and federal laws in order to "maintain its secrecy."


Mr. Paduano betrayed my trust, his wife's trust, and his oath as a lawyer. Most importantly, he revealed his percolating plan to take over my bar as payment for his pro bono services.


His twisted logic was gut-wrenching. He thought he 'deserved' to be paid $400,000.00 for his pro bono service - PLUS - take 51% control of my bar? He wanted me to pretend he was my hero for his pretending to return 100% of the bar back to me?


He accused me of being ungrateful!!!


My intention in writing my book "Drunk with Power" is to finally "set the record straight" and defend my excellent reputation as a successful restaurant operator and entrepreneur...hamstrung by the clueless fantasies of greedy 'silent' investors.


It is high time. The defamation that Mr. Paduano has wrought continues to shadow my life and career. His blackmail and extortion, which by their very nature, continue until exposed, must finally end, now. He lives across the street from me in the Dakota Building.


It is the ENORMITY of Mr. Paduano's list of frauds that is so damning, and make vividly clear his limitless entitlement and total disregard for the law.


Mr. Paduano's four-year-long lawsuit was to set me free of meddling 'silent' investors so that I could control my own financial destiny... and, most importantly, to open a chain of wine bars as I had originally planned.


Ruth and I had spoken many times over the years about her partnering with me in some form to start a chain. I did not create Wine & Roses to be a one-off. That is why I named it Wine & Roses Bar and Cafe(S) LLC . 


This fact was ignored by all my investors who hamstrung me, wasting my time managing one bar instead of creating a chain.


IN 2005, I HAD FIRST MOVER ADVANTAGE!!!

HIS ILLEGAL AGREEMENT IS NOT ENFORCEABLE AS HE CLAIMS ABOVE

MR. PADUAN0 RELENTLESSLY USED HIS BULLY PULPIT TO LIE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ME.  HE OMINOUSLY MISSTATES LAWS, THREATENS TO SUE ME, AND SOLICITS ME TO COMMIT CRIMES ON HIS BEHALF - AND AGAINST MYSELF!


**********************************


JANKE V. JANKE, 1975:

  

"It has been held that one who has failed to register his name with the state liquor authority in obtaining a license, thereby violating the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, cannot invoke the power of the equity court to impose a constructive trust on his share of the proceeds of that business being conducted in violation of statute"


- RUTKIN VS. REINFELD: 1956


"A member of an illegal partnership is not entitled to enforcement of any right depending on the partnership agreement."


**********************************  


THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT TAKEAWAY TO ALL OF HIS 'BELATED' EXCUSES AND LIES IS:


NOTHING CAN ***RETROACTIVELY*** ABSOLVE HIM OF FIRST AND FOREMOST:  COERCING ME TO SIGN HIS 286 LLC ILLEGAL AGREEMENT,  STEALING 51% OF MY BAR FOR HIMSELF.  AND ROLLING HIS $400,000.00 PRO BONO SERVICE INTO A COLLECTABLE DEBT.


MR. PADUANO'S NON-STOP EXCUSES TO AVOID RESPONSIBILITY AND PLACING BLAME WAS APPARENTLY HIS FORTE AND USEFUL IN HIS LINE OF WORK.


BEFORE HE TOOK CONTROL, I WAS A DEAR FRIEND AND PRO BONO CLIENT, OR SO MR. PADUANO LED EVERYBODY TO BELIEVE.    


•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••


IF ONLY MR. PADUANO HAD RETURNED THE BAR BACK TO ME 100% AS PROMISED, WINE & ROSES WOULD HAVE BEEN A SUCCESS, AND THERE WOULD BE MORE THAN ONE BAR. 


•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••


I  COULD HAVE SOLD A SMALL MINORITY INTEREST TO AN "EXPERIENCED" INVESTOR WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN  A "REAL" ASSET TO THE BUSINESS'S EXPANSION, INSTEAD OF BEING CHAINED TO  MY HOSTILE LAWYER.

BLACKMAILS ME TO NOT CONTACT 'MY' OWN LANDLORD!

HE THREATENS ME TO NOT TELL HIS PARTNER ABOUT LANDLORD'S OFFER TO ERASE $63,900.63 OF DEBT HE CAUsed

MR. PADUANO ABSURDLY USES THE INTERNET TO DEFAME TODD AS A CAREER CRIMINAL FOR AN INCIDENT IN 1978 WHEN TODD WAS A STUDENT.


WHY WAS MR. PADUANO SO DESPERATE TO KEEP THIS VERY UNUSUAL AND SUBSTANTIAL $63,900.63 OFFER HIDDEN FROM HIS PARTNER, LEONARD WEINTRAUB, AND 'MY WINE & ROSES LANDLORD,' WHO HAD BEEN HOLDING 'MY' $30,000.00 LEASE DEPOSIT SINCE 2005?


WHY WOULD MR. PADUANO REFUSE MY LANDLORD'S MOST GRACIOUS OFFER TO ERASE THE ENTIRE W&R LLC $63,900.63 DEBT CAUSED BY MR. PADUANO LOCKING DOWN THE BAR ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 DURING IT'S BUSIEST SEASON?  THAT, ALONE, WOULD HAVE GENERATED THE CASH TO PAY ANY DEBTS.  


WHY DID MR. PADUANO FINALLY DEMOLISH MY BAR DOWN TO THE SUPPORT BEAMS...AS A LAST RESORT?  TO KEEP ME FROM TAKING IT OVER AFTER HE LEFT.   


HE WAS DRAINING MY $30,000.00 DEPOSIT SO IT WOULD NOT BE RETURNED TO ME.   AND, SO THAT I WOULD HAVE TO PAY SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS TO REBUILD THE BAR, AGAIN.  


WHY ELSE WOULD HE NOT TAKE MY LANDLORD'S OFFER? AND INSTEAD, HOLDING THE BAR HOSTAGE, LOCKING THE DOORS FOR FIVE MONTHS - AND THEN ILLEGALLY GUT IT DOWN TO THE SUPPORT BEAMS?  


TODD AND I ARE THE ONLY LEGAL SIGNATORIES AND GUARANTORS ON THE LEASE - BECAUSE MR. PADUANO WOULD NOT PUT HIS NAME ON ONE OR REPRESENT HIMSELF AS AN OWNER.


I WAS BLACKMAILED FROM CONTACTING MR. WEINTRAUB, ACCORDING TO THE 286 LLC, MY 25% PARTNER.  BESIDES SIGNING THE CALAMITOUS 286 LLC AGREEMENT, HE MIGHT HAVE ALSO BEEN A VICTIM OF MR. PADUANO'S FALSE NARRATIVES.  OR THE INSTIGATOR?  

I TRUSTED MY LAWYER TO "LEGALLY" PERFORM ALL OF HIS DUTIES AND TO SUBMIT ANY AND ALL REQUIRED LEGAL WORK FOR 'HIS' NEW 51% OWNERSHIP OF THE BAR.  INSTEAD, HE LIED TO ALL IN HIS EFFORTS TO KEEP HIS NAME OFF OF ANY RECORD, ANYWHERE.  HE PREFERED AVAILING.

he kept me in the lawsuit only to steal my bar for himself.

MR. PADUANO DID NOT FORMULATE HIS PLAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF MY BAR OVERNIGHT.

 
IN HIS '2012' EMAILS, HE REFUSED MY REQUESTS TO QUIT HIS FECKLESS LAWSUIT BECAUSE: "THERE WOULD BE NOTHING IN IT FOR HIM:"  


THERE WAS NO JUSTIFIABLE 'REASON' FOR HIM TO NOT LET US SETTLE, OTHER THAN HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST.  


JUST SIX MONTHS AFTER OUR FORMER INVESTORS OUTED US, THEY ADMITTED THEY MADE A MISTAKE AND RUINED "WINE & ROSES."  THEY ASKED US TO COME BACK TO TAKEOVER AGAIN AND FOREVER. THEY PROMISED THEY WOULD NEVER BOTHER US AGAIN. 


THE DAY THE MEETING WAS SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE, TODD WAS SITTING AT AN OUTDOOR CAFE ON COLUMBUS AVENUE WITH OUR FRIEND, THE EDITOR OF THE NY POST, AND HIS WIFE CELEBRATING OUR TOTAL VICTORY, THE VERY BEST OUTCOME POSSIBLE. HOW GOOD DO YOU THINK WE FELT?


THEN MR. PADUANO CALLED.. HE DEMANDED WE DO NOT GO TO THE MEETING, HE TOLD US HE WILL RESIGN AS OUR LAWYER IF WE DID.   HE CONTACTED THE INVESTOR THAT COORDINATED THE MEETING AND QUEERED IT FROM HAPPENING. 


WE WERE ALL IN DISBELIEF.  WE THOUGHT MR. PADUANO MIGHT BE DRUNK TO SAY SUCH A CRAZY THING.  SO, BELATEDLY, WE WENT ANYWAY.  BUT OUR FORMER INVESTORS HAD ALREADY LEFT AND THE TWO THAT STAYED WERE AS UNCOMFORTABLE AS WE WERE WHEN WE TOLD THEM OUR LAWYER SAID WE HAD TO LEAVE. 


SO WE GAVE THEM SOME COLORFUL WINE & ROSES CAPS THAT WE HAD BROUGHT FOR EVERYBODY TO WEAR AND ALL BE IN GOOD HUMOR AT THE MEETING.  THEN WE LEFT.

 

CORRUPTION - LPC WILL NOT DISCLOSE THE FILER OF COMPLAINT

nYS liquor license fraud

"I AM A MAJORITY MEMBER OF THE (NAMELESS) CORPORATION THAT CONTROLS WINE & ROSES."

MR. PADUANO'S SHAMELESSLY FRAMES ME FOR HIS OWN 18 MONTHS OF AVAILING MY BAR.


IN A FAILED ATTEMPT TO COMPLETE HIS 'CIRCLE OF LIES' MR. ANTHONY PADUANO MALICIOUSLY WRITES AN OBFUSCATED LETTER TO THE SLA CLAIMING:


  • "I AM A MAJORITY MEMBER OF THE (NAMELESS) CORPORATION THAT CONTROLS WINE & ROSES."  


HE MIGHT JUST AS WELL HAVE WALKED INTO THEIR HEADQUARTERS AND SHOUTED: 


  • "I AM AN AVAILER!!!"  


BECAUSE HE JUST ADMITTED IN WRITING THAT HE WAS.  


------------------------------


HE CRIMINALLY LIED TO CLOSE THE LOOP OF HIS FALSE NARRATIVE THAT I REFUSED TO SIGN HIS APPLICATION. AND THEN HE SLANDERED ME, TRYING TO FRAME ME FOR HIS FRAUDS.  IT WAS SICK BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION!  HE WAS INTENT ON TRYING TO HAVE MY LICENSE REVOKED.  IT WAS MONSTROUS!  I HAVE NEVER MET ANYONE WITH SO LITTLE HONOR. ANY DOUBTS I MIGHT HAVE HAD WERE OBLITERATED. HE WAS A GROSSLY ENTITLED DANGEROUS NARCISSISTIC CRIMINAL - OUT TO GET ME.


HE WANTED TO RUIN MY ENTIRE FINANCIAL FUTURE AND SQUASH ME LIKE A BUG.  IT HIT ME ALMOST AS HARD AS WHEN HE STOLE MY BAR.  I ALMOST KILLED MYSELF.


HE DID NOT HAVE TO WRITE THE SLA ANYTHING AT ALL. I WAS THE ONLY ONE THE SLA WOULD ALLOW TO RETURN THE LICENSE.  MR. PADUANO HAD TAKEN THE LICENSE OFF OF THE WALL AND PRETENDED I WOULDN'T GIVE IT BACK TO HIM TO RETURN TO THE SLA.  


ALL HIS DUPLICITOUS LIES ARE  IRREFUTABLY PROVEN WITHOUT A DOUBT ON THIS WEBSITE, WRITTEN WITH HIS OWN VIRULENT HAND.


------------------------------


MR. PADUANO WROTE SEVERAL VERY DUMB AND UNSUCCESSFUL FRAUDULENT LETTERS TO THE SLA FRAMING ME THAT HE: 


  • WAS MY POWERLESS VICTIM ??? AND CLAIMED I STOPPED HIM AND HIS LAW FIRM FROM SIGNING HIS SLA APPLICATION - FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS???


THE SLA REQUIRED ONLY ME TO RETURN THE LICENSE AS THE 100% LICENSE HOLDER AND 100% OWNER -- THAT MR. PADUANO, HIMSELF, HAD PERPETUATED TO EVERYONE INCLUDING THE SLA  SINCE DAY ONE. 


MR. PADUANO WAS FLAUNTING HIS AVAILING LIKE IT WAS JUST A TECHNICALITY.  THAT IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY ONLY HE, HIS LAW FIRM, AND HIS "SECRET" 286 SHELL LLC DID NOT NEED A LICENSE TO "CONTROL WINE & ROSES."   


WHEN THE LANDLORD REFUSED TO GIVE HIM THE LOCATION WITHOUT ME, JUST LIKE AN ARSONIST WITHOUT GASOLINE, MR. PADUANO RETALIATED USING POWERTOOLS TO GUT MY BAR DOWN TO THE SUPPORT BEAMS.  


THE ONLY REASON MR. PADUANO DESTROYED THE ENTIRE LOCATION WAS TO MAKE CERTAIN I COULD NEVER GET MY BAR BACK WHEN HE FINALLY RETURNED THE LOCATION TO THE LANDLORD AFTER HOLDING IT HOSTAGE FOR FIVE MONTHS.


SO FOOLISHLY, I PUT MR. PADUANO'S BIG LIFE AHEAD OF MYSELF, SO HE WOULD NOT LOSE HIS LAW LICENSE, DESPITE HIS OUTRAGEOUS ATTEMPT TO HAVE MY LIQUOR LICENSE REVOKED.  


MR. PADUANO DESTROYED MY REPUTATION SO THAT HE WOULD HAVE AN EXCUSE TO TELL RUTH WHEN HE CLOSED THE BAR AND TRIED TO REOPEN IT FOR HIMSELF WITH HIS STILL VIRGIN 286 LLC.


  • WHAT WAS MR. PADUANO'S EXCUSE FOR TURNING DOWN THE LANDLORD'S OVERLY GENEROUS OFFER TO ERASE THE $63,900.63 RENT ARREARS?  


  • WHAT WAS HIS EXCUSE FOR BLACKMAILING ME TO NOT TELL MR. WEINTRAUB ABOUT THE $63,900.63 FORGIVENESS OFFER? 


  • WHAT WAS HIS EXCUSE TO NOT VACATE THE LOCATION HE CLOSED DOWN AND WAS HOLDING HOSTAGE... ACCUMULATING MORE ARREARS?  IT WAS BECAUSE I WAS THE ONLY LEGAL 100% OWNER RESPONSIBLE AND HE HAD ZERO LIABILITY. 


  • WHAT WAS HIS EXCUSE FOR BLACKMAILING ME TO NOT TALK TO MY OWN LANDLORD ABOUT MY OWN LEASE...WHO WAS HOLDING 'MY' SUBSTANTIAL LEASE DEPOSIT? 


  • WHAT WAS HIS EXCUSE FOR NOT BEING ON THE LEASE? - IT WAS SO HE WOULD HAVE ZERO LIABILITY.

  

***WHY WAS HE SO DESPERATE TO KEEP EVERYBODY SEPARATED AND NOT TALK TO EACH OTHER? IT WAS BECAUSE HE TOLD DIFFERENT LIES TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Porat, Ruth wrote: Thinking of you!  I have been traveling too much. Look forward to seeing the new bar open and toasting your success, happiness and health! Xo (btw … why not call it Jennifer’s … kind of like the new Elaine’s … think it has a great ring to it, really.


RUTH PORAT, CFO OF GOOGLE / ALPHABET

"THIS IS GOING TO END VERY BADLY, WORSE THAN It SEEMS NOW"


ANTHONY PADUANO, ATTORNEY AT LAW

"the mantei job"

GOOD TITLE FOR A MOVIE. HE S0LICITS TODD TO INTERFERE WITH A WITH AN ONGOING GOVERNMENT INVESTIG

BUT STRESS IS ALL WE DID:  JOURNALISTS WHO WROTE THE ARTICLES, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS WHO ARRESTED MR. MANTEI WOULD BE MONITORING GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS FOR ANY NEW POSTS ABOUT "THEIR CASE."  


I AM SURE THEY WOULD WANT TO TALK TO THE HACKER ERASING THEM.  ADDITIONALLY, THE NEWS PEOPLE THAT HAD WRITTEN THE ARTICLES WOULD ALSO FEEL "VIOLATED."


If not illegal, ARRANGING A FEE to pay Todd to TAMPER with 'anything' involving an ONGOING GOVERNMENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION is certainly FAR FROM ETHICAL.  


Mr. Paduano would not accept (a half dozen very politely worded) PUT-OFFS for an answer. ...for almost a month.  


Why in the world would Todd ever consider getting involved on the wrong side of a GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION?


***HOW DARE MR. PADUANO TO HAVE MADE PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS EVEN BEFORE INFORMING TODD OF MR. MANTEI'S VERY EXISTENCE.  


WHY COME TO TODD TO DO IT?  WHY WOULD HE NOT ASK RUTH?***

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL JUDGE

"THE WEBSITE HIT ME OVER THE HEAD LIKE A SLEDGEHAMMER..." "I DO NOT DOUBT A WORD."    - NYS SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL JUDGE

INVOICE FRAUD: MAILED FRAUDULENT INVOICE FOR 'EXACTLY' $400,000.00 PAST DUE FOR PRO BONO SERVICES

I DID NOT OWE MR. PADUANO, 286 LLC OR P&W LLP $400,000.00. 

INVOICE FRAUD: WIRE FRAUD.

MAILED INVOICE #12638 FOR $348,013.89 PAST DUE PRO BONO!

LUDICROUSLY REMINISCES I DEFEATED HIM AND HIS ENTIRE LAW FIRM'S EFFORTS TO GET A SIMPLE SIGNATURE?

GROSS NEGLIGENCE:

Mr. Paduano belatedly and ludicrously blames me for his gross negligence to act as my lawyer and fiduciary partner.  I had no idea what he was doing and not doing.  HE WAS GASLIGHTING ME ABOUT EVERYTHING - JUST  AS HE DID FOR THE PREVIOUS 4 YEARS.


WHY DID HE NOT SEND ME DAILY, IF NOT HOURLY EMAILS REMINDING ME TO SIGN SUCH AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT - LIKE HE DID HARASSING ME TO COMMIT  BANK FRAUD?  WHY DID HE NOT HAVE HIMSELF LICENSED FOR THE NEXT YEAR AND A HALF???

Find out more
JENNIFER INSPECTING RESTROOMS

IMPORTANT INFO FOR VIEWING WEBSITE:

THIS WEBSITE IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, IN THE DAILY PROCESS OF UPLOADING DOCUMENTS.


THE WEBSITE WAS BUILT ONLY TO DISPLAY DOCUMENTS TO SUPPLEMENT MY ALLEGATIONS IN MY BOOK. THEY SPEAK FOR THEMSELF.


THE DOCUMENTS ARE DISPLAYED BY CATEGORY, NOT DATE.  HOWEVER, WHEN YOU PUT ALL OF THE CATEGORIES  IN ORDER BY DATE, IT IS EASY TO SEE THAT THEY REPRESENT A "DAILY AND CONSISTENT" ONGOING EFFORT BY MR. PADUANO TO CLOSE THE COMPANY AND TAKE IT OVER FOR HIMSELF.



NOTES:


  • THE DOCUMENTS ARE REDLINED AND MANY EMAILS ARE DISPLAYED ONLY CONTAINING THE RELEVANT EXCERPTS WHICH ARE HIGHLIGHTED AND EXPANDED - BECAUSE THAT BEST ILLUSTRATES HOW SHOCKING THEY LOOKED TO TODD AND I WHEN WE READ THEM.  THEY ARE NOT TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT.  THEY ARE THE CONTEXT AND JUST AN EXAMPLE OF A HUNDRED OTHERS WITH THE SAME SENTIMENT.


  • MR. PADUANO WAS WAITING FOR THE BAR TO FAIL DURING THE WINTER.  MR. PADUANO FAILED TO HAVE OUR FRONT DOOR VESTIBULE RETURNED BY THE FORMER INVESTORS TO STOP THE WINTER AIR FROM GUSHING INTO THE ENTIRE 24FT X 24FT SPACE. 


  • WE NEVER BORROWED ANOTHER PENNY FROM MR. PADUANO OR ANYBODY ELSE AFTER JUNE 3, 2014.  WE COULD NOT INVOLVE ANY OTHER INVESTOR INTO THE MR. PADUANO'S MESS BY SELLING SOME OF MY OWN STOCK.  MR. PADUANO COULD NOT SELL HIS STOCK, BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO HAVE ANY.  


  • BY THE SPRING OF 2015, THE BAR HAD ENOUGH CASH FLOW TO UPGRADE TO A 'FULL' LIQUOR LICENSE.  THAT INCENSED MR. PADUANO BECAUSE THE FULL LICENSE APPLICATION WOULD BE 'PROBLEMATIC' IN HIS AVAILMENT.  


  • MR. PADUANO HAD LIED TO ME FROM MAY 5, 2014 UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2014 THAT HE HAD APPLIED FOR THE "FULL" LIQUOR LICENSE, THAT WE BOTH HAD AGREED THE BAR NEEDED TO COMPETE AGAINST ALL THE OTHER WINE BARS THAT NOW HAD THEM.


  • MR. PADUANO ONLY APPLIED TO THE SLA TO CHANGE 'MY' CURRENT 21% LICENSE OWNERSHIP TO 100% OWNERSHIP.  THIS REFLECTED ALL HIS OTHER FILINGS EVERYWHERE ELSE, THAT I WAS THE 100% OWNER OF MY BAR.  


  •  I FINALLY RECEIVED MY 100% LICENSE ON JULY 23, 2014 MR. PADUANO OBTAINED FOR ME, TAKING HIM ALMOST 3 MONTHS .  FOR THE NEXT 18 MONTHS HE REAFFIRMED THAT I OWNED 100% ON EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT AND EMAIL WITH EVERY GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND BUSINESS CONCERN. 


  • THE EMAILS AND DOCUMENTS DISPLAYED ON THIS SITE MAY BE REPEATED UNDER MULTIPLE CATEGORIES BECAUSE MANY TIMES THEY FIT MORE THAN JUST ONE CATEGORY.  


  • EVERY OFFICIAL DOCUMENT MR. PADUANO CIRCULATED AFTER MAY 5, 2014 WAS A 'CONFLICT OF INTEREST' AND POTENTIALLY 'WIRE FRAUD.'  HOW COULD IT BE OTHERWISE?   


  • MR. PADUANO AVOIDED EMAILING ME AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.  INSTEAD, HE WOULD WRITE TO MY HUSBAND.  TODD HAD TO RELAY THE INFORMATION DISCUSSED TO ME.  SOMETIMES MR. PADUANO COPIED ME.  


  • THERE WAS NO REASON FOR HIM TO KEEP ME OUT OF THE LOOP, OTHER THAN HE WROTE THAT HE "RESENTED (REPRESENTING) ME FROM DAY ONE."


  • MR. PADUANO WAS FULL OF RESENTMENT BECAUSE RUTH MADE HIM HELP ME.  SO HE HELPED HIMSELF, INSTEAD.  


  • TO AVOID ANY CONFUSION, THIS 'WEBSITE' DOES NOT INCLUDE "THE DAKOTA BAR," WHICH I WAS MANAGING AT THE TIME, WAITING FOR WINE & ROSES TO BE RETURNED TO *ME.*   

 

  • HIS ILLEGAL CLOSING OF WINE & ROSES WOULD 'IMMEDIATELY' CAUSE MY REMOVAL AT THE DAKOTA BAR.  AND IT DID.  THE SAME WEEK.  


  • HE WAS HOPING THE DAKOTA BAR WOULD ALSO CLOSE.


  • THE EXPONENTIAL DISGRACE AND HUMILIATION OF LOSING TWO BARS AT ONCE COMPLETELY DESTROYED MY REPUTATION AND GAVE ME A SEVERE NERVOUS BREAKDOWN WITH LIFELONG CONSEQUENCES.


  • THIS WAS THE STRESS I WAS LIVING UNDER:   I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING TWO BARS THAT WERE ACROSS THE STREET FROM EACH OTHER WITH DIFFERENT MAJORITY OWNERS WHO VIEWED EACH OTHER AS COMPETITORS.  AND, WORSE, EACH WERE IN COMPETITION WITH ME.


  • MR. PADUANO LIVES ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME AND WE EACH LIVE WITHIN A BLOCK OF BOTH BARS.  ALMOST EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE AREA KNEW OF MY POPULAR VENUES.  IS THERE ANY DOUBT I WAS AN AGORAPHOBIC NERVOUS WRECK ABOUT TO CRACK?


  • ALMOST EVERYTHING TODD AND I DID TO APPEASE MR. PADUANO WAS, IN FACT, A FUTILE ATTEMPT TO AVOID MY INEVITABLE CATASTROPHIC HUMILIATION CAUSED BY HIS ABSOLUTELY PREPOSTEROUS AND "IMPOSSIBLE TO FULFILL" 286 LLC AGREEMENT.


  • NOW MY REPUTATION WOULD CONSIST OF LOSING THREE BARS (W&R TWICE) BY IRRATIONAL, SHAMELESS, AND RUTHLESS INVESTORS.  


TODD AND I ALWAYS SHOWERED MR. PADUANO WITH RESPECT.  INDEED, WE THREW FLOWERS AT HIS FEET.  WE WERE AWED BY WHAT A BEAUTIFUL PERSON HE WAS AND HOW LUCKY WE WERE TO HAVE HIM AS A FRIEND. 





*********************************************************





MR. PADUANO PLACES THE BELOW FRAUDULENT SIGN ON W&R LLC DOOR - ONLY TO HAVE CB7 CANCEL HIS HEARING BECAUSE HE DID NOT YET HAVE ANY LICENSE OR EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, A LEASE!


THE LANDLORD REFUSED TO EVER GIVE HIM A LEASE.


IN RETALIATION, MR. PADUANO ANGRILY BROKE MY MARBLE BAR INTO PIECES AND GUTTED THE LOCATION DOWN TO THE SUPPORT BEAMS.  

"I WILL NOT OFFER MR. PADUANO A LEASE" - LANDLORD

JUST A FEW MORE QUESTIONS:

HOW MANY CRIMES DID MR. PADUANO COMMIT BEFORE NOVEMBER 12, 2014? 


THIS IS THE DATE THAT HE BELATEDLY INFORMS ME, WITHOUT PROOF, FOR 'ALLEGEDLY' DISOBEYING HIS 'ALLEGED' INSTRUCTIONS TO SIGN HIS INTENTIONALLY HIDDEN, MISDIRECTED, ERRONEOUSLY FILLED OUT APPLICATION.


ON NOVEMBER 12, 2014, INEXCUSABLY, HIS APPLICATION WAS ALREADY THREE MONTHS PAST HIS MISDIRECTED LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY BOARD ON AUGUST 6, 2014. IT WAS SIX MONTHS LATE! SINCE MAY 5,2014  IN VIOLATION OF THE SLA SHORT 10 DAY LEGAL "DEADLINE" TO INFORM THEM STATED ON ALL LIQUOR LICENSES. 


MR. PADUANO FALSELY AND SHAMELESSLY ACCUSED ME OF HAVING CAUSED HIS GROSS NEGLIGENCE(?) IN HIS BACKWARDS CIRCUITOUS PLAN TO MAKE ME HIS SCAPEGOAT.


WHY WOUILD I WANT THE SLA TO CLOSE THE BAR?  IT WAS MY PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION THAT WAS ON THE LINE.  NOT HIS.  IT WAS MY LAST INCH. 



***********************************


THESE ARE SOME OF THE QUESTIONS MR. PADUANO NEEDS TO ANSWER: 


***********************************


HOW WAS IT ***MY FAULT*** THAT MR. PADUANO:

 

  • COERCED ME TO SIGN HIS SURPRISE 286 LLC AGREEMENT IN WHICH HE ROLLED $400,000.00 PRO BONO SERVICES INTO A COLLECTABLE DEBT?


  • SENT ME FRAUDULENT DOCTORED SUMMARY INVOICES TOTALING EXACTLY $400,000.00 FOR HIS PRO BONO SERVICE?


  • MASTERMINDED HIS OWN SERIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST?


  • AVAILED MY BAR, REFUSING TO PUT HIMSELF OR HIS COMPANIES ON A SINGLE OFFICIAL RECORD, NOT ONLY FOR THE SLA APPLICATION, BUT ON ANY DOCUMENT ANYWHERE?


  • COMMITTED FRAUD TO EVERY ENTITY WITH WHICH I DID BUSINESS BY PROVIDING FALSE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION AND CHANGING HIS REPRESENTATION OF HIS ASSOCIATION WITH ME ACCORDING TO HIS HAT OF THE DAY?  


  • INTERFERED WITH MY OPERATION FROM DAY ONE BY TELLING ME TO "HIRE TOM TO DO IT" (HIS LAW FIRM OFFICE MANAGER) TO NOT JUST BE MY BOOKKEEPER, BUT TO BE MY CONTROLLER?...  


  • AS MR. PADUANO SAID ABOUT TOM: "WHOSE VIEWS ON HOW TO RUN YOUR BUSINESS ARE FAR DIFFERENT THAN YOURS" AND "THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT"... VIOLATING HIS OWN 286 LLC AGREEMENT TO NOT INTERFERE WITH MY EXCLUSIVE OPERATION OF MY BAR?


  • PREVENTED ME FROM SIGNING A NEW LEASE OFFERED BY 'MY' LANDLORD?  TODD AND MY NAME WAS STILL ON THE LEASE SINCE 2015?  MR. PADUANO WAS NOT. 


  • PREVENTED ME FROM OBTAINING PROPER INVESTORS THAT HE ASKED ME TO FIND WHEN HE WANTED "OUT"?


  • REFUSED TO SEND HIS APPLICATION TO THE SLA AS INSTRUCTED BY CB7, AND INSTEAD JUST DROPPED THE BALL, NEVER TO PICK IT UP AGAIN.  ALL UNBEKNOWNST TO ME UNTIL HE CLEARLY ADMITTED IT ON NOVEMBER 12, 2014?   


  • COULD NOT UNDERSTAND A ONE SENTENCE SIMPLE DIRECTIVE, TOLD TO HIM REPEATEDLY AND ON THE LIQUOR LICENSE ITSELF, PROMINENTLY STATING: "HAVE TO APPLY TO THE SLA FIRST BEFORE THE TRANSFER OF ANY AMOUNT OF STOCK IS TRANSFERRED?"


  • FARCICALLY BLAMED ME BY CREATING THE FALSE NARRATIVE THAT 'I' WAS FIT AND ABLE TO CONTINUE TO DEFEAT HIS ENTIRE LAW FIRM, IN THEIR 'ALLEGED PURSUIT' OF THE ALL IMPORTANT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS?  


  • DID NOT MENTION HIS FAILURE TO APPLY FOR A LICENSE TO ME UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2014, WHEN IN HIS EMAIL, HE REMINISCED ABOUT IT.  AND THEN, STILL CONTINUED TO BREAK THE NEW YORK STATE AVAILING LAWS FOR MORE THAN A YEAR?  ...NEVER ONCE TRYING TO CORRECT HIS ILLEGAL POSITION?"


  • DID NOT SEND ME CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS TO SIGN ANYTHING, OR HAVE ANY 'EMERGENCY' HOURLY FOLLOWUP EMAILS AS HE ALWAYS DID WHENEVER HE WANTED ANYTHING ELSE DONE? 


  • HAD PREVENTED ME FROM RELINQUISHING THE ORIGINAL LAWSUIT BECAUSE THERE WAS "NOTHING IN IT FOR HIM?">


  • REFUSED NEW INVESTORS' PROPOSALS OUT OF HAND THAT HE, HIMSELF, REQUESTED...FALSELY WRITNG:  "THEY WERE GOOD FOR (ME,)  BUT NOT FOR (HIM)"? >  


  • HE COULD NOT SELL HIS STOCK BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO OWN ANY AND HELD NO LEGAL POSITION?


  • WOULD NOT LET ME BUY HIS ALLEGED 51% OVER TIME BECAUSE HE WANTED TO SELL HIS MAJORITY CONTROL INTACT?  TO ANYBODY BUT ME?  BECAUSE HE DID NOT WANT ME TO EVER HAVE CONTROL OF IT, EVER.?


  • WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, CONFUSED MY TAX RECORDS FILING A FALSE 1065-K TAX RETURN TO THE IRS THAT I WAS A 49% SHAREHOLDER - WHILE HE PROLIFERATED THAT I WAS THE ONLY 100% SHAREHOLDER TO EVERY SINGLE OTHER ENTITY, GOVERNMENT OR OTHERWISE...PRECIPITATING A NYST&F UNIFORMED AGENT KNOCK ON MY APARTMENT DOOR IN JUNE 2016?


  • DEFAMED ME WITH TOTAL FABRICATIONS TO RUTH AND ALL THAT WOULD LISTEN?


  • TOTALLY DEMOLISHED THE SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR BUILDOUT THAT I HAD TO WORK 24/7 FOR OVER 4 YEARS TO PAY BACK TO MY INVESTORS - SO THAT I WOULD HAVE TO SPEND THE SAME CONSTRUCTION FEES TO REBUILD IT...AGAIN?


  • CLOSING MY BAR AT THE BEGINNING OF THE BUSIEST SEASON THAT WOULD HAVE GENERATED PROFITS TO PAY OUTSTANDING BILLS, AS IS NORMAL IN THE INDUSTRY?


***HIS BELATED FALSE ACCUSATION (COMMUNICATED TO TODD, NOT ME) THAT I AM "TO BLAME" FOR ALL HIS UNETHICAL, IMMORAL, AND, INDEED, CRIMINAL CONDUCT - COMPRISES OF HIS 'SINGLE' HIDDEN AUGUST EMAIL ATTACHMENT THAT HE BELATEDLY POINTED TO ON NOVEMBER 12 , 2014 AS "PROOF" OF MY BAD WILL.  


...THE EMAIL HE SHOWED ME WAS NOT PROOF, IT DID NOT EVEN  *COPY* ME OR TODD.  THE EMAIL ONLY PROVED HE DID NOT.


***IN ANY EVENT, WOULD NOT ANY LAWYER SEND ME HOURLY REMINDER EMAILS UNTIL IT WAS SIGNED FOR SUCH AN EXISTENTIAL MATTER?


WHY WAS I DISRESPECTFULLY NOT EVEN COPIED ON ANY OF THE DOZEN EMAILS BETWEEN HIMSELF AND THE COMMUNITY BOARD, BEFORE AND AFTER AUGUST 8, 2014.  WHO, BY THE WAY, GAVE HIM THE SAME INSTRUCTIONS AS I DID.   MR. PADUANO DID NOT FOLLOW THEM, AND INSTEAD DROPPED THE BALL ENTIRELY.  


TODD AND I HAD NO KNOWLEDGE HE DROPPED THE BALL.   WHY DID HE NOT TELL US ABOUT IT WHILE WE WERE STILL NAIVLY TRYING TO MAKE THE BAR WORK?  (STUPIDLY THINKING HE WOULD COME TO HIS SENSES?).

  

BE THAT AS IT MAY, MR. PADUANO HAD ALREADY COMMITTED TOO MANY CRIMES TO EVER TURN BACK.  HIS PLAN REMAINED THE SAME:


  • DUMP ALL LIABILITIES AND BANKRUPT W&R LLC IN ORDER TO RE-OPEN UNDER HIS STILL VIRGIN 286 LLC WITH HIS 100% OWNERSHIP.  CLEARLY PROVED BY THE PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN DISPLAYED. 


  • DAILY, INTENTIONALLY INFLICT AS MUCH EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ON ME AS HE COULD MUSTER WITH OUTRIGHT FALSEHOODS.  FILE CLAIMS IN COURT TO BANKRUPT 'ME' FINANCIALLY, SO THE BAR WOULD NEVER FALL BACK INTO MY HANDS. 


  • AND FINALLY, VINDICTIVELY DEMOLISH THE BAR DOWN TO ITS SUPPORT BEAMS TO ACCOMPLISH THAT GOAL WHEN THE LANDLORD REFUSED TO GIVE HIM A LEASE WITHOUT ME. 


MR. PADUANO CONSIDERED HIMSELF AN UNSTOPPABLE "SHARK."  HIS ONLY REQUEST WHEN HOSTING HIS LAW FIRM'S ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PARTIES WAS TO PLAY "SCARFACE" ON THE BAR'S TVs.  HIS LAW OFFICE INTERNET SERVER IS NAMED "BARRACUDA." 


***JUST THINK.  IF MR. PADUANO HAD SIMPLY LET ME HAVE MY BAR BACK AS HE PROMISED FOR 4 YEARS,  I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CONTINUE MY SUCCESS, AND OPEN MORE BARS.  HE WOULD HAVE MADE MONEY.  HE WOULD NOT HAVE CAUSED EVERYBODY SO MUCH PAIN, INCLUDING HIMSELF. 


*   *   *   *   *   *   *    *   *   *   *   *   *   *    *   *   *   *   *   *   *  


DISCLAIMER:  I am not a lawyer.  My opinions and descriptions of the emails and documents displayed on this website, and my chosen nomenclatures for them, are strictly derived from my own layperson's understanding of the definitions of the applicable statutes and torts in basic legal reference manuals and guides.  All references to "crime" are alleged and used in accordance with its colloquial definition  "A grave offense, especially against morality... Reprehensible, foolish, or disgraceful... Evil, shameful, or wrong. 

SUMMARY

instead I tried to commit suicide

DRUNK WITH POWER • THE TWO DAKOTAS • W.A.R. • COPYRIGHT Ⓒ 2024 • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

  • Introduction
  • Wine & Roses Bar
  • About
  • Contact
  • DISCLAIMER:
  • BACKGROUND STORY
  • ILLEGAL AGREEMENT
  • INVOICE FRAUD
  • S.L.A. FRAUDS
  • AVAILING
  • CORRUPTION
  • EXTORTION / BLACKMAIL
  • GROSS NEGLIGENCE
  • CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  • BANK FRAUD
  • INSURANCE FRAUD
  • TAX FRAUD
  • • SUMMARY
  • ASSAULT / HARRASSMENT

Powered by